From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [bug, org] footnote-action broken with narrowed buffer Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 23:11:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87h9s2d28g.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87lhhhzdf5.fsf@gmx.us> <87bnidcnfq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h9s5z2kx.fsf@gmx.us> <87fv7obnyb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87tww4xz4i.fsf@gmx.us> <877ft0bdw0.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnicxeax.fsf@gmx.us> <87oambrz4d.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmTph-0005M9-Fp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:11:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmTpe-0005Lz-AE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:11:21 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:54315) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YmTpe-0005Ls-0B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:11:18 -0400 Received: from x200s ([92.225.121.220]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LxPuE-1ZOWa03zfm-016xbG for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 23:11:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87oambrz4d.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:57:06 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Good idea. I didn't thought about using "org-src.el", but, albeit not > perfect, it goes a long way towards avoiding these problems. > > I toyed a bit with that. Now C-' on a (non inline) footnote reference > should edit it in a dedicated buffer. I tried it. It works nicely. I like it better than the default move to footnote. It's less of an interruption (to me) and it works consistently across "narrows". Would it make sense to allow this to hook into org-footnote-action? For this, the popup buffer would also have to work with *new* footnotes. Note that new footnotes currently break the narrow, which is pretty annoying. Thanks, Rasmus -- . . . It begins of course with The Internet. A Net of Peers