From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Oleh Krehel <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Conditional link export?
Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2015 15:56:33 +0100
Message-ID: <87h9kwbkv2.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87ziyri8lk.fsf@gmail.com> <878u6buupy.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87d1vmgdt6.fsf@gmail.com> <87fv0hubym.fsf@gmail.com>
	<874mgwd1mi.fsf@gmail.com> <87h9kw8t1t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53195)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>) id 1ZvROQ-00009W-1G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 09:56:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>) id 1ZvROM-0004uo-Pa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 09:56:29 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:34792)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ohwoeowho@gmail.com>) id 1ZvROM-0004uK-J1
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 09:56:26 -0500
Received: by wikq8 with SMTP id q8so54596606wik.1
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 08 Nov 2015 06:56:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from firefly (dyn069045.nbw.tue.nl. [131.155.69.45])
	by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
	r65sm9203367wmb.20.2015.11.08.06.56.24 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
	(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Sun, 08 Nov 2015 06:56:24 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87h9kw8t1t.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Sun, 08 Nov 2015 15:27:58 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> There is already inline syntax for any language, including elisp:
>
>   src_emacs-lisp{(foo)}
>
> and, if you use the library of Babel,
>
>   call_foo{}
>
> I don't see the need to add yet another way to call inline code from an
> Org document.

Is that a new feature? First time I've heard about it, and I did google
for inline code block evaluation before.

In any case, the HTML export result of e.g. this:

    The current time is: src_emacs-lisp{(format "<a href=%S>%s</a>" "http://google.com" (format-time-string "%H:%M"))}.

is:

    The current time is: <code>&lt;a href</code>"<a href="http://google.com/">http://google.com/</a>"&gt;15:50&lt;/a&gt;=.

which is far from what I want.

And I still think that Elisp could benefit from privileged call
syntax. Compare:

    !(foo)

to

    src_emacs-lisp{(foo)}

No one would quickly forget the first call syntax after using it once,
while the second one is highly forgettable and clumsy.

Additionally `org-edit-src-code' doesn't work for these blocks.

regards,
Oleh