From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [ANN] Agenda speed up
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 19:13:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87h8vikczp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87h8wtugst.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87r2upkzda.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r2uoow4x.fsf@fastmail.fm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33192)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1dyho7-00050q-5D
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 13:13:36 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1dyho4-0004Np-59
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 13:13:35 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:38302)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1dyho3-0004Me-Vi
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 13:13:32 -0400
Received: from saiph.selenimh
	(000043010000000000000469.ipv6.commingeshautdebit.fr
	[IPv6:2a03:a0a0:0:4301::469])
	(Authenticated sender: mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr)
	by relay4-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0687F17209D
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun,  1 Oct 2017 19:13:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ngz by saiph.selenimh with local (Exim 4.89)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1dyho2-00043p-KO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Oct 2017 19:13:30 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87r2uoow4x.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Matt Lundin's message of "Sat, 30
	Sep 2017 13:54:06 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> writes:

> I think I have a fairly standard setup (some customizations, additional
> features such as habits). I'll do some testing with minimal examples to
> see if I can find out why the new branch is so much slower in my case.

Are 1.4 s "so much slower" than of 1 s. Granted, this is a terrible 40%
slowdown, but, all things being equal, 1.4 s is still acceptable,
considering, IIUC, you are using the worst case scenario, i.e., a single
day view from a cold cache.

> In the meantime, I'd like to that the branch *not* be merged until we
> are sure that it is actually faster for the majority of use cases.

Feedback is welcome.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou