From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aaron Ecay Subject: Re: unable to edit indirect-buffer in fundamental mode without losing pretty printing in base buffer org mode Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 21:37:11 +0100 Message-ID: <87h8msu96w.fsf@gmail.com> References: <518DCC34-E435-42F7-A15E-FAE7727033F8@scratch.space> <87muwlt6c1.fsf@gmail.com> <87y3g43mjy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59463) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fN2Pm-0006r4-J8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2018 16:37:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fN2Pi-0002CF-LR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2018 16:37:18 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]:53248) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fN2Pi-0002C0-DM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 27 May 2018 16:37:14 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id a67-v6so26900683wmf.3 for ; Sun, 27 May 2018 13:37:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y3g43mjy.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou , Van L Cc: org-mode-email Hi Nicolas, 2018ko maiatzak 27an, Nicolas Goaziou-ek idatzi zuen: [...] >=20 > Also, we are in feature freeze for Org 9.2, so this would need, in any > case, to wait for the release. >=20 > As a consequence, would you mind reverting the patches related to this > feature? Of course, done in c32938b7f. I did not realize how the freeze for 9.2 was working. >=20 > However, your fix is not great at all. It was discussed on this ML, > about square brackets in links: it causes "jumpings" during editing, > which some users, including me, find annoying. Even if it was optional, > it would need to be discussed beforehand. I must have missed that discussion. I would say that the =E2=80=9Cjump=E2= =80=9D in this case is only three characters, whereas for links it is much more (as the whole link becomes un- and re-hidden). I would not like links to work this way, but for foo-scripts I found it to be quite natural in my testing. So I hope that we can discuss it (as an optional feature, certainly) once 9.2 is out. --=20 Aaron Ecay