Hello! I'm not an experienced mailing list user, but I will try to be brief. Please excuse my lack of common courtesy. * Problem There needs to be a way to coax Org into interpreting something as an emphasis marker, even if it ordinarily would not look like it (for example, because it is in the middle of a regular word, when putting emphasis on only part of a word.) - Version of Org: 9.1.6 - Version of Emacs: GNU Emacs 25.3.2 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) * Suggested Solution Include the Unicode zero width no-break space character (U+feff) in both ~pre~ and ~post~ sections of ~org-emphasis-regexp-components~. I currently have trouble accessing code.orgmode.org (502 Bad Gateway), but I imagine the solution to look something like --- org.el 2018-06-06 09:33:56.602335268 +0200 +++ org-zwnbsp-emphasis.el 2018-06-06 09:39:37.985958647 +0200 @@ -4355,7 +4355,7 @@ ;; set this option proved cumbersome. See this message/thread: ;; http://article.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/68681 (defvar org-emphasis-regexp-components - '("- \t('\"{" "- \t.,:!?;'\")}\\[" " \t\r\n" "." 1) + '("- \ufeff\t('\"{" "- \ufeff\t.,:!?;'\")}\\[" " \t\r\n" "." 1) "Components used to build the regular expression for emphasis. This is a list with five entries. Terminology: In an emphasis string like \" *strong word* \", we call the initial space PREMATCH, the final This has the added tiny benefit that legacy documents that still use U+feff as a byte order mark may be able to get emphasis also on their first word... (Not sure if this is a problem, actually, just throwing it out there.) * Discussion - Does this even make sense to begin with, or is it just me? - Is the zero-width no-break space the most sensible character to do this with? I see the zero-width joiner as the alternative – but that appears to have more legitimate uses inside words, especially in some non-Western scripts such as Arabic and Indic. I use U+feff mostly because it is actually sort of a space but not quite. * Related Reports I found an email in the archives which touches on the same point[1], but suggests a more radical change. [1]: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2017-09/msg00363.html Regards, Chris