From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Provide org-insert-subitem Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 09:33:05 +0100 Message-ID: <87h7zwnr26.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87tv49bf9e.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9oo28cd.fsf@alphapapa.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j1nSH-0007Zr-Jt for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 Feb 2020 03:33:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87v9oo28cd.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Sun, 02 Feb 2020 11:43:30 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Adam Porter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Adam Porter writes: > Please do not delete org-insert-subheading! Done :) I still find it strange to keep functions that are used nowhere in the Org's core--except of course for functions that explicitely mention as usable by the user (e.g. `org-clock-persistence-insinuate'.) I'd rather have these functions stored in a org-utils.el library for those who care. This is not urgent, of course, we can have this discussion later on. -- Bastien