From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OJXoNcu9nl6cEAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:32:59 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id GISCLNG9nl5jBgAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:33:05 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F0D2941E13 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 09:33:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:54670 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQpH4-0000p9-NO for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 05:33:02 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQpGJ-0000ml-5C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 05:32:15 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQpGI-0004dT-0C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 05:32:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]:38528) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jQpGH-0004UD-Kl for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 05:32:13 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id g12so2861433wmh.3 for ; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 02:32:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=wpw4QPOVXGnh/EjrTb7Oc+6AzcsFxOhrFtkHfqeKb94=; b=b01uv82c2k69UuWvnRlk1gMxb13Uz2W0A2tFdiA+2iOi54QCfwFoRVvec/uH6xsV3/ kxUSkt0LYubKZtnLlkKKTjV0s1MBfhZRuGMl9smKcaiVA5hGZVbg3521JBp9JV+RWcWt XRDLhQp5EXfRa37vOxOj3NnBRjy7vlc4CHftGfryStvV9ODvkmeDUShnz46IEIFobKqY pfddKEy3WILDQ0+KgebMPvSy+46/lnmYATvIJmmPnWBdS9WxX7G57MIlcqzo7SH8QPtm E48X1y463D3RQQSV6dtENHsj7LN61cehvAI8m1SK0O0uSXqe9zTn47mV7QeYnmwLoHPz yWyg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=wpw4QPOVXGnh/EjrTb7Oc+6AzcsFxOhrFtkHfqeKb94=; b=P373QEU7VYDoaST7y/HRJXt+TV0RugXxB1czNF/FbYlkeX204AVWvp7mCblhiiJ/6q Sv6BEoFRh8cQelIE1xW5c9Ytkb5pfUNFLypH13kQ/pmr1ioVhaEqlhLIUWs77ZE4vkL1 r1OctoyfLGw0EqWWfZsarKLEgr+lB3rPmH7odCm2FhzyoXWTN5C3e/8GMYj/fG9u6gPR u5JmINQOmgI6h4H4IK/36tCh9RxPgPBVbAjpNF9CkcbxaTuu2uL2jJ7Dt/cUwHdRHRtC tMfC2JpMaoaqiq25zfHfsEWsXKl2CUm1ItWwXAT5Spg6+lYc43fiq3oqn2K5/3EmHTr7 FT7g== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZpoCSDq8xpSWCG3BFKKfp9iOoagyMVK7ITktXFPrt92HCFjh/l cv0qqb/aR+i5w5GPrCFrPII= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypL8/hfs+ItkRHAfW3dK/gJ+ZsvKSAPXpLcHOheop4ez1KiRrVpjZUApToD6h3KSX86XfDkwzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1d4b:: with SMTP id d72mr3805121wmd.19.1587461528193; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 02:32:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aspire-5942 (p2E5A5B1B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [46.90.91.27]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y63sm2908778wmg.21.2020.04.21.02.32.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 02:32:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Marco Wahl To: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: Failing tests References: <87zhb9n2bw.fsf@gmail.com> <87v9ltr1a6.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:32:06 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87v9ltr1a6.fsf@kyleam.com> (Kyle Meyer's message of "Tue, 21 Apr 2020 03:00:17 +0000") Message-ID: <87h7xdmbft.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32a; envelope-from=marcowahlsoft@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: [-] PROGRAM ABORT : Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). Location : parse_addr6(), p0f-client.c:67 X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::32a X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -1.81 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=b01uv82c; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-1.81 / 13.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.56767664268302]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.51.188.0/24:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.23), country: US(-0.01), ip: 209.51.188.17(-0.57)]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[209.51.188.17:from]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; DWL_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[gmail.com:dkim]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[marcowahlsoft@gmail.com,emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:209.51.188.0/24, country:US]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[emacs-orgmode@gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[kyleam.com:email]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[46.90.91.27:received]; RCVD_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[7]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: xpRmGZLSaCgo Kyle Meyer writes: > Marco Wahl writes: > >> When building with "make test" I get >> >> #v+ >> 2 unexpected results: >> FAILED ob-tangle/jump-to-org >> FAILED test-org-attach/dir >> #v- >> >> does this ring a bell for anybody? > > FWIW I don't see either failure on my end (Emacs 26.3). Do they fail > for you consistently? Good to know that the tests pass on your side. I'll check again and report in the case I find something interesting. Thanks! -- Marco