From: Bastien <email@example.com> To: Kyle Meyer <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: email@example.com, Stig Brautaset <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: tags-todo agenda shoud not ignore DONE items (was: tags-todo org-agenda-custom-command weirdness) Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2020 07:07:20 +0200 [thread overview] Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> (Kyle Meyer's message of "Tue, 16 Jun 2020 05:11:29 +0000") Kyle Meyer <email@example.com> writes: >> This behaviour of `tags-todo` seems inconsistent to me. If `todo` can >> find DONE items, why shouldn't `tags-todo` do the same? > > Perhaps it should. The behavior has been that way for a long time, and > the code makes it look very deliberate. That of course is not an > argument that it should be that way, just one basis for expectations > (and a reason to be wary of breaking workflows). > > And it looks like it was actually supposed to change to your preference > in 2017. There was a report  that essentially boils down to what > you're saying, I think. In response, 942b6267a (org-agenda: `tags-todo' > command type includes DONE keywords, 2017-04-18) was applied, but then > reverted for reasons not related to the intended change in behavior . > > There was then a follow-up in 2fb129b5c (`org-scan-tags' retrieve all > TODO keywords, not only not-done ones, 2017-08-17). As far as I can > tell, that was supposed to achieve the behavior you're after but didn't. > I don't have time to dig much at the moment, but quickly stepping > through org-scan-tags, I think the issue is that the MATCHER argument > still filters out done states. > > >  https://orgmode.org/list/CAF96XX0XxhPKjAxy0dQmOiy3rnT+DUok4p1y71F1AwyJaNL-MA@mail.gmail.com/ >  https://firstname.lastname@example.org/ Confirming this as an issue, if someone wants to fix it. -- Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-06 5:07 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-06-13 14:40 tags-todo org-agenda-custom-command weirdness Stig Brautaset 2020-06-13 16:19 ` Stig Brautaset 2020-06-15 3:16 ` Kyle Meyer 2020-06-15 18:52 ` Stig Brautaset 2020-06-16 5:11 ` Kyle Meyer 2020-06-16 8:31 ` Stig Brautaset 2020-09-05 15:03 ` Bastien 2020-09-05 20:06 ` Stig Brautaset 2020-09-06 5:04 ` Bastien 2020-09-06 5:07 ` Bastien [this message] 2021-05-16 22:56 ` tags-todo agenda shoud not ignore DONE items Bastien 2021-05-17 4:46 ` Kyle Meyer 2021-05-17 5:24 ` Bastien
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: https://www.orgmode.org/ * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: tags-todo agenda shoud not ignore DONE items (was: tags-todo org-agenda-custom-command weirdness)' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).