From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Bremner Subject: Re: Re: Proposed key binding changes: archiving and attachments Date: Fri, 06 Nov 2009 23:11:01 -0800 Message-ID: <87fx8qizcq.wl%bremner@pivot.cs.unb.ca> References: <20091106134034.GA7997@taupan.ath.cx> <6ac505ad0911061711j9fcc5en4dc4b2e013c5f68e@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: David Bremner Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N6fTK-00081U-4N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:12:30 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1N6fTE-00080p-0d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:12:28 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52671 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1N6fTD-00080m-R2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:12:23 -0500 Received: from pivot.cs.unb.ca ([131.202.240.57]:33003) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N6fTD-0001to-HU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 02:12:23 -0500 Received: from bremner by pivot.cs.unb.ca with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1N6fTB-0006Rp-9Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:12:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org At Sat, 7 Nov 2009 07:33:30 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > I actually think that few people use archiving to sibling. Am I > wrong about this? For what it is worth, I have started to use archive to sibling quite a lot in the last month or so. I also like to tidy up my org files, but I need to keep the structure for monthly and tri-monthly clock tables. d