From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [ANN] Changes to lists Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 17:47:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87fwsidz9e.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> References: <87k4hve0y7.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <5090609E-4B3E-49F5-9C69-B40C4C6CF16D@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38377 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PhPbP-0000pG-22 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:49:38 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PhPaP-00073D-Gx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:49:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:50006) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PhPaP-00072U-CP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:48:13 -0500 Received: by wyj26 with SMTP id 26so4641456wyj.0 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2011 08:48:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5090609E-4B3E-49F5-9C69-B40C4C6CF16D@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Org Mode List Hello, >>>>> Carsten Dominik writes: >> In original patch, bullet type was passed to HTML and DocBook >> exporters. I removed that part of the code for various reasons. > I am not sure if I understand this. What was passed through in the > original patch, and what have you changed? In original patch, when you had a list with alphabetical bullets, you would also have alphabetical bullets in HTML export (same for DocBook). Now, bullet type in Org buffer has no influence whatsoever on export. > Also a first little thing I have found: > 1. a list > - a sub-list > - shslkjg kj > - dsjkg kajhg > Some text belonging to main list. > - and even another sub-list > - aksjdf alkjshf > aslkdjf lkjasdflkj aklsjdfh klasj > If I go to the end of the last line and press M-RET it fails with > the backtrace below. Not sure what it should do in this case, but my > preferred result would be to create the "2." item for the first > list. I cannot reproduce it. I get "2." as expected. Odd. Regards, -- Nicolas