From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [babel] Specified colnames
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 14:15:42 -0600
Message-ID: <87fvz0zslt.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <86y5cuxfro.fsf@somewhere.org> <87obdp0ybb.fsf@gmail.com>
	<86ip3w957l.fsf@somewhere.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:56980)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UPIUJ-00046w-6W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:16:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UPIUB-000232-Ue
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:16:23 -0400
Received: from mail-da0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]:55503)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UPIUB-00022i-KK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:16:15 -0400
Received: by mail-da0-f54.google.com with SMTP id p1so2745911dad.41
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Apr 2013 13:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <86ip3w957l.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of
	"Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:45:34 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> Extra question: tested with a sh block, both of the above do work, that is
> with strings or symbols. Which one is supposed to be better (that is, will be
> more portable with time), if there is one?
>

Both will be maintained.  The contribution of a test exercising both
options could provide an extra guarantee of perseverance.  This is also
a good first step towards editing the code. :)

>
>> Additional testing by someone more familiar with R than myself would be
>> greatly appreciated.
>
> Can't yet be that person, sadly. But time will come that...
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

Cheers,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte