From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Build fail with emacs 24.3.1 Date: Mon, 20 May 2013 12:13:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87fvxh3oal.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <4213D585-9331-41E2-AA2B-03550D3E043B@univie.ac.at> <878v5reck1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8738vznjw9.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87wqtalnlc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87txoete7m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ehfhg5ni.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87sj3rrzim.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2sn82ax.fsf@Rainer.invalid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35948) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeNtR-00051U-UN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:04:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeNtN-0002a5-8e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:04:41 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]:60941) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UeNtN-0002Zu-1o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 20 May 2013 07:04:37 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b13so5058932wgh.30 for ; Mon, 20 May 2013 04:04:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87d2sn82ax.fsf@Rainer.invalid> (Achim Gratz's message of "Sun, 19 May 2013 16:36:06 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Achim Gratz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Achim, Achim Gratz writes: > Bastien writes: >>> Aside from the issue of whether using macros here is needed or >>> appropriate, I can't find anything wrong with the macros or their use so >>> far. If that upholds, the test not working points to a rather >>> substantial bug in either the test framework or Emacs 24.3. >> >> It's not too late to explore this. > > This has been whittled down to a small test case after reverting the > changes locally and finally reported as Emacs bug #14422. Thanks for narrowing down the problem and reporting it as a bug. For the record: independantly of the problem, I think it's better to use defuns instead of macros in Org's code for this. Best, -- Bastien