From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve usage of odt content templates
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:12:09 +0200
Message-ID: <87fvk45vsm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <20140519104254.GX15335@pestilenz.org> <87zjidd9pn.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51988)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1WmliI-0004Pu-Gu
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:12:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Wmli9-00075C-G2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:12:22 -0400
Received: from mail-wg0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::234]:37083)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1Wmli9-00074q-9k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 20 May 2014 11:12:13 -0400
Received: by mail-wg0-f52.google.com with SMTP id l18so650121wgh.11
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 20 May 2014 08:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87zjidd9pn.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 19
	May 2014 18:17:24 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Christian Kellermann <ckeen@pestilenz.org>

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> I think this is a more general issue: should we implement an
>
>   #+OPTIONS: title:nil
>
> feature? I think it makes some sense since we already have date:nil and
> author:nil. In any case, keywords are not meant to be used for booleans.
> This should be an OPTIONS item.

+1!

-- 
 Bastien