From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: wish: provide flush_right/right_aligned text rendering directive Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 11:15:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87fvk29ntu.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20140510135216.GA2041@boo.workgroup> <878upvsw1u.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20140521073916.GA25852@boo.workgroup> <87sio3ic8y.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877g5f1dso.fsf@gmail.com> <878upvw9yr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8738g31cfg.fsf@gmail.com> <87egznutrb.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwebyzcr.fsf@gmail.com> <87y4xvjfjk.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ioozyuuf.fsf@gmail.com> <87k39fje7m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <877g5ezspi.fsf@gmail.com> <868upugp7u.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47672) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnP6R-0003A8-EU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 05:16:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnP6I-0005Sn-GF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 05:15:55 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43125) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WnP6H-0005Sg-O8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 05:15:46 -0400 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WnP6C-0007l7-6z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 May 2014 11:15:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: <868upugp7u.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Thu, 22 May 2014 11:03:17 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org Hi Sébastien, Sebastien Vauban writes: > Do I understand correctly that those won't be converted to their > HTML and LaTeX counterparts (flushright and raggedleft)? For HTML, the user can define a new class "justifyright". For LaTeX, yes, we should probably handle this as \begin{flushright}. > Shouldn't it be better to make that conversion as well for the back-ends > which support such features? When it comes to consistency, I kinda fully trust Nicolas, don't worry. I guess it's just a matter of taking the time to polish this a bit. -- Bastien