From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Incorrect hexification in URLs in LaTeX Export Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 09:18:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87fvjy5nsm.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <0DEDD4E4-A513-4B03-AA78-25D9859EEA9F@gmail.com> <87bnxbb6ff.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87wqfscy1r.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87ppljfr99.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <43DB32AC-723C-4046-9DCD-4A1FD2DD7323@gmail.com> <87y4xq5rls.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <8761kuxrk1.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33096) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoShf-0002F9-MH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 03:18:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoSha-0003Xp-0l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 03:18:43 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::230]:41630) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoShZ-0003Xh-Pv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 03:18:37 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id q59so6472291wes.21 for ; Sun, 25 May 2014 00:18:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8761kuxrk1.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> (David Maus's message of "Sun, 25 May 2014 09:09:50 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Maus Cc: "R. Michael Weylandt " , David Maus , Andreas Leha , "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" Hi David, David Maus writes: > I can only speculate why they were escaped in the first place: + ; and > = do have special meaning in HTTP URIs and IIRC Org did not draw a > strict distinction between escaping for internal purposes and escaping > of HTTP URIs. Yes, that's certainly it -- thanks for enlightening me on this. + ; and = are not the only reserved characters, cf. RFC 3986 mentions # @ and others that we don't escape. So I think we're good here. Best, -- Bastien