From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: proposal to have ignoreheading tags/properties Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:11:32 +0200 Message-ID: <87fvja576z.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k38m5903.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60977) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wv9Tj-0001CD-IW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:12:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wv9Tb-0000rm-5e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:11:59 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43257) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wv9Ta-0000rO-Uz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 14:11:51 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wv9Ta-0008Hq-93 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:11:50 +0200 Received: from e178191110.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.191.110]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:11:50 +0200 Received: from tjolitz by e178191110.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2014 20:11:50 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Ken Mankoff writes: > Another common (for me) example is to have a heading called "* Appendix" > in a paper, and then the LaTeX "\appendix" command. The Org heading is > just for me. It should not be exported. All headings below the \appendix > command are Org sub-sections but should be promoted to \section in the > final document. then IMO it should be ,---------------------------- | * Appendix | ** Latex Command :noexport: | \appendix | ** Subsec1 | ** Subsec2 ... `---------------------------- This is very common ,----------- | * Level 1 | text | ** Level 2 | text | ** Level 2 `----------- but often not very good. The text under Level 1 might deserve its own subsection, and then things become easier and more consistent. -- cheers, Thorsten