From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [RFC] Rewrite `org-entry-properties' using parser Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:59:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87fvhaj5vg.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87tx5xunas.fsf@gmail.com> <87a97o9w53.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mxrw139.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEy0e-00041s-UV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 05:59:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEy0Y-0001kp-Sd for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 05:59:52 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XEy0Y-0001kl-MQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 05:59:46 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XEy0X-00013Z-Jw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:59:45 +0200 Received: from 46.166.186.241 ([46.166.186.241]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:59:45 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 46.166.186.241 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Aug 2014 11:59:45 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Thorsten Jolitz writes: >> >>> here is my first take of rewriting `org-entry-properties'. >> >> Interesting. A first round of comments follows. > [...] > But this looks like an entirely different function to me, and IMO it > does not make much sense that you explain what you want and I type > it in (*because instead of explaining you could just as well type it > yourself in the same time*), so I rather leave this to you (or > whoever wants to do it). [my emphasis added] This is not directly related, I'm just "guarding" my own interests here. I *really* appreciate Nicolas' way of giving comments as I learn a lot about my mistakes this way and how not to repeat them (though I most likely do). Surely Nicolas could take most of the ox-related patches and iron out bugs and "bugs" the first time they are submitted. Writing emails proposing change takes more time. It's meant as a favor and frankly the alternative is less pleasing — at least for me. Granted, you, Thorsten, is a lot more "senior" is writing code than me and perhaps you see it differently. Cheers, Rasmus