Dima Kogan <lists@dima.secretsauce.net> writes:

> Suppose I have this .org file:
>
>  |   |
>  #+TBLFM: @1$2=5
>
> It's a 1x1 table with a formula. The formula sets a cell that's out of
> bounds in the table, so evaluating this formula results in an error. How
> set-in-stone is this behavior? I haven't dug too deeply into the code,
> but are there fundamental assumptions here? Would a patch that extends
> the table before applying such a formula be too naive in some way?

Here's a tiny patch that adds the columns (not rows) as needed. Is this
reasonable?