From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: How to extract TODOs from date-tree Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:20:47 -0400 Message-ID: <87fve79ie8.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87ioj4cdd5.fsf@gmail.com> <87a94fbmxc.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> <20141029092449.5a2538ee@gaia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjSFQ-00054i-Lg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:21:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjSFK-00061e-Oa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:21:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XjSFK-00061U-IT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 08:21:02 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XjSFH-0002VS-Pj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:20:59 +0100 Received: from pool-108-20-41-17.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.20.41.17]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:20:59 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-20-41-17.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 13:20:59 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Detlef Steuer writes: > Hi Nick! > > >> If there are use cases out there, it might be worth collecting them >> and then thinking about how to support them better. If there aren't, >> maybe it should be thrown out. >> > > > Oh, NO, donĀ“t do that! Datetrees were a major enhancement for my > workflow. I use one as a kind of "lab logbook" and time tracker. > > Fits my use very well and I would miss it a lot! > > I think datetrees work like intended and stable. > Yes, that was a bit provocative, wasn't it? I don't think there is any need to worry. Could you describe your use case? Maybe it could fill the hole in the manual. Also, maybe my impression that it's thinly supported may be wrong, but you would know better: is there datetree functionality that you find yourself wishing for? -- Nick