From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] Recognize property blocks even after text Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:12:17 +0100 Message-ID: <87fvabxwu6.fsf@gmx.us> References: <86wq3nucw8.fsf@sachachua.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44985) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLql5-0005rE-DT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:12:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLqkz-0002bU-Su for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:12:31 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41780) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLqkz-0002b5-MG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 05:12:25 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YLqky-00009q-8f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:12:24 +0100 Received: from 102.201.133.37.dynamic.jazztel.es ([37.133.201.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:12:24 +0100 Received: from rasmus by 102.201.133.37.dynamic.jazztel.es with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:12:24 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sacha Chua writes: > Hi! I noticed that the refactored org-get-property-block no longer > allows for any text (aside from the SCHEDULED / DEADLINE / CLOSED) text > between the heading and the property drawer, which gave me problems when > I accidentally added text or timestamps or things like that. Also, it > means org-gcal's default format (which puts the timestamp before the > property drawer) doesn't work, so maybe a bunch of other things rely on > the old behavior. If that part of the change was unintentional, would > you consider the patch below? It seems to be okay with my Org files, but > maybe that flexibility was removed for performance reasons. Hope this is > useful! Did you see this discussion? I think it's a feature. http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/91752 —Rasmus -- And I faced endless streams of vendor-approved Ikea furniture. . .