From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Citation syntax: Underscore MUST(?) be allowed in cite keys? Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:02:08 +0100 Message-ID: <87fv9e8mdr.fsf@gmx.us> References: <874mq0399a.fsf@gmx.us> <54F75222.8030805@gmail.com> <87pp8o1t9f.fsf@gmx.us> <87pp8o6nt9.fsf@berkeley.edu> <87fv9i9z8s.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bnk60zhc.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54FA9AA9.9070505@gmail.com> <87r3t05okc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ioeci6f6.fsf@gmx.us> <87r3szk6q9.fsf@gmx.us> <87oao3yluf.fsf@berkeley.edu> <54FD7A20.60907@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUvS2-0008Rh-Cm for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:02:23 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUvRw-0003la-Eo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:02:22 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40875) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUvRw-0003lG-94 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 07:02:16 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YUvRu-0000ek-3U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:02:14 +0100 Received: from tsn109-201-154-139.dyn.nltelcom.net ([109.201.154.139]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:02:14 +0100 Received: from rasmus by tsn109-201-154-139.dyn.nltelcom.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 12:02:14 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Vaidheeswaran C writes: > Believe me, if I had quick access to pandoc-hs, there would be a > ox-pandoc-citeproc already in the tree by now. My opinion would be to perhaps not put too much energy into anything Haskell. It's extremely annoying when you don't have the luxury of prebuild packages. E.g. on Arch there's no prebuild pandoc and ghc is 800MB! Extrapolating from git-annex getting the right dependencies (down to version-number, sometimes) seem like a mess with cabal. —Rasmus -- C is for Cookie