From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [patch] small fix to org.texi Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <87fv2i46j7.fsf@gmx.us> References: <20150913091237.18b122a6@gauss> <87k2ru4787.fsf@gmx.us> <20150913092953.09ca3ef3@gauss> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59607) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbAKG-00064h-KK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:40:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbAKD-0004ui-El for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:40:24 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38133) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbAKD-0004tt-8G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 12:40:21 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZbAKB-0003Yv-Ek for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:40:19 +0200 Received: from x590cd54b.dyn.telefonica.de ([89.12.213.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:40:19 +0200 Received: from rasmus by x590cd54b.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 13 Sep 2015 18:40:19 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Joe Riel writes: > Thanks for the notice. > > I didn't see that when I first read it. Hmm. I posted two others > yesterday. What should I do now? Edit the commit messages and > post the patches? Would the duplicate posts be an issue? Thanks, I hadn't seen those patches. Just reply to the mail with the patches and attach the patch with updated commit message. Since your git email suggests that you are associated with a major software company, it's best if we follow the rules stringently. Also, I believe there's a limit of 10 lines you can change without copyright assignment. Though you have only changed documentation, which may or may not be within the same limit.... Anyway, it's not an issue presently. Hopefully somebody knows to what extend there's a difference between documentation and code, if at all. Thanks for the patches and sorry to be a bother. Rasmus -- One thing that is clear: it's all down hill from here