From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julien Cubizolles Subject: Re: BEAMER_ACT ignored during export in column environment Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:52:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87fv2534bw.fsf@free.fr> References: <87613ju4qa.fsf@free.fr> <87io7jg00w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u8ean38.fsf@free.fr> <87k2rwvrid.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40713) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zefn6-0003wd-He for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:52:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zefn3-0005nS-9Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:52:40 -0400 Received: from smtp2-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.2]:38075) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zefn3-0005m5-3f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:52:37 -0400 Received: from lago (unknown [82.244.252.119]) by smtp2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E32B4B005F for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:52:35 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87k2rwvrid.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:40:26 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Julien Cubizolles writes: > >> Nothing in my user's guide about overlay specifications for column >> you're right. However the mode (
) has an effect: >> the environment is ignored in
mode at least. Moreover, a pure >> overlay specification like to a column environment doesn't >> prevent a beamer document from being compiled. Couldn't org export it >> so that we recover the usage=C2=A0? > > We would be playing with undocumented stuff.=20 > > If you think that's fine, please provide a patch for it, ideally with > comments in the source, and an entry about it in ORG-NEWS. I'll consider it but I discovered that it's not behaving the way I expect it to so, I'll wait until I've cleared that up. Julien.