From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: BUG: org-beamer-select-environment select multiple environments not working? Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 23:00:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87fut78932.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87oa7v9pf9.fsf@saiph.selenimh> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57023) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5Jab-0003Nh-Ea for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:10:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JaW-0004xa-5r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:10:08 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JaV-0004xV-V5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 17:10:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b5JaV-0005DD-8H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:10:03 +0200 Received: from ip-178-203-233-73.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de ([178.203.233.73]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:10:03 +0200 Received: from rasmus by ip-178-203-233-73.hsi10.unitymediagroup.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 23:10:03 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Rainer M Krug writes: > >> It seems that I can not longer select multiple environments at the same >> time by using org-beamer-select-environment. >> >> - I am on a header >> - I press C-c C-b >> - then C-c to enable multiple selections >> - press (b)lock and (c)olumn and both are selected >> - press [RET] to accept >> - only one gets applied (in my case column) > > Aren't environments mutually exclusive? Not necessarily. On the top of my head, you could have a column group with columns inside. This example used to be possible. I haven't checked now. -- A page of history is worth a volume of logic