From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: org-plus-contrib, where is library-of-babel.org? Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:55:43 -0400 Message-ID: <87fue4gzvk.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87fue58v9p.fsf@gmx.us> <87a84d37me.fsf@kyleam.com> <87pod83h5y.fsf@bzg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53054) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUZAE-0003lN-BN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:55:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUZA9-0007ZD-Sh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:55:50 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com ([64.147.108.71]:59029 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dUZA9-0007Yy-LK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:55:45 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87pod83h5y.fsf@bzg.fr> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Bastien Guerry Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Bastien, Bastien Guerry writes: > Kyle Meyer writes: Note that that's not me writing any of that :) >>>> Apparently, library-of-babel.org is not distributed with the Org mode >>>> that ships with emacs. Not sure why that is. I'm guessing it's a >>>> license issue? >>> >>> It will be in the next release (in /emacs/etc/org/). If there's a license >>> issue it needs to be removed. > > The reason why this library-of-babel.org was not in Emacs is not > because of its lack of license. I guess it's because Carsten and > Eric didn't think of it as something that should land in Emacs. > > Hence my will to clarify this by moving it to Worg, where it will > be more easily accessed. Sounds reasonable to me. I don't have a good understanding of library-of-babel.org and have never used it, though, so my opinion shouldn't count for much either way. Thanks. -- Kyle