From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug] in capture Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 21:55:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87fu2rtly4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <48ea87ad-0447-72ad-decc-aa4bcf6ec089@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41083) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ2WF-000534-Rf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 15:55:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ2WD-0001KB-05 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 15:55:27 -0400 Received: from relay1-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.193]:47055) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fJ2WC-0001Ft-OV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 16 May 2018 15:55:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48ea87ad-0447-72ad-decc-aa4bcf6ec089@gmx.de> (Thomas Holst's message of "Tue, 15 May 2018 19:26:30 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Thomas Holst Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Thomas Holst writes: > I have among other the following template: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > ("hr" "Rechnung erfassen" table-line >   (file+function "~/git/org-priv/Univ_Beih.org" > th:capure-find-open-vers-regn) >   "| # | %^u | %^{Arzt/Apotheke} | %^{fr wen|Lida|Oleg|Victor|Simon} > | %^{Betrag} | %^u | | [[file:%c][link Beleg]] |" >   :table-line-pos "III-1" :immediate-finish t) > #+end_src > > With org-mode from git I get an error when using this template: > > : condition-case: Capture template ‘hr’: integer-or-marker-p I have too little information to reproduce the problem. Could you provide a minimal example, i.e., no custom function like `th:capure-find-open-vers-regn' and a minimal document where this table line is going to be inserted. Also, I would need the backtrace. Thank you. > Was there a change in the syntax I missed? No, there wasn't. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou