From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Loris Bennett" Subject: Re: Feature Proposal: Titled Paragraphs Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:55:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftjjtstg.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <3eb58af3-c03b-4225-ec31-15321c05ceff@gmail.com> <87o8y7sigg.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <87h83zy28j.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:33661) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI2z-0003hR-SL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI2y-0006jz-Lj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:37 -0400 Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:47430 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI2y-0006gG-E0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 10:55:36 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iNI2t-000nIi-E2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 16:55:31 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi, What would be an actual example of a "paragraph that is not related to Section I, but doesn't deserve a section title"? Cheers, Loris Dominik Schrempf writes: > Hello! > > I agree with this proposal. At some point I already asked if the following > structure is possible: > > #+begin_example > * Title > ** Section I > Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetuer adipiscing elit. Donec hendrerit tempor > tellus. Donec pretium posuere tellus. Proin quam nisl, tincidunt et, mattis > eget, convallis nec, purus. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis > parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Nulla posuere. Donec vitae dolor. > Nullam tristique diam non turpis. Cras placerat accumsan nulla. Nullam rutrum. > Nam vestibulum accumsan nisl. > > Another paragraph that is not related to Section I, but doesn't deserve a > section title. Another paragraph that is not related to Section I, but doesn't > deserve a section title. Another paragraph that is not related to Section I, but > doesn't deserve a section title. Another paragraph that is not related to > Section I, but doesn't deserve a section title. > #+end_example > > With titled paragraphs, this document structure could be achieved. > > All the best, > Dominik > > Christoph Michelbach writes: > >> On 2019-10-23 15:24, Fraga, Eric wrote: >>> Why not use a further headline if you are exporting to LaTeX? In the >>> default configuration, the 4th level heading corresponds to \paragraph >>> in LaTeX. >>> >> >> 1. Because headlines and paragraphs are different things. One is used for >> hierarchical structuring and description, the other only for description. >> 2. Because that'd mean skipping hierarchical levels when using paragraphs on a >> high level. >> 3. Because headlines are collapsed by default. I realize the default can be >> changed but if you like hierarchical levels to be collapsed, you still have to >> expand paragraphs far up individually or expand all the hierarchical levels >> below by dobule-tabbing. > > > -- Dr. Loris Bennett (Mr.) ZEDAT, Freie Universität Berlin Email loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de