From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Subject: Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:07:51 -0600
Message-ID: <87ftf5zyso.fsf@alphapapa.net>
References: <87pnebf2ku.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44748)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1j4d82-0002yN-14
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:07:58 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1j4d81-0005QU-2k
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:07:57 -0500
Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:59816)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1j4d80-0005QI-Tj
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:07:57 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1j4d7z-0003n6-BT
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 05:07:55 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

I generally approve of all of these changes.  However, hiding emphasis
and macro markers can make editing text at the boundaries of emphasized
text non-intuitive, which I can imagine might frustrate some new users,
so that should probably be carefully considered.  The other changes seem
like obvious improvements to me.  :)  Thanks for your work on this,
Bastien!