emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Juan Manuel Macías" <maciaschain@posteo.net>
To: orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: text after sub headings?
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2021 20:17:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fsqhhi5f.fsf@posteo.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <sq4tr5$otj$1@ciao.gmane.io> (Max Nikulin's message of "Fri, 24 Dec 2021 23:51:42 +0700")

Max Nikulin writes:

> Text books and magazines may contain insets (side notes), sometimes
> even page-long ones. They present independent material that may be 
> interesting or useful in particular context or may be just skipped
> when a reader is concentrated on main material. Such inset may be
> considered as a heading that is inserted in the middle of another
> section. It may have larger margins, smaller font, distinct font face,
> another background color, box around or just rule at some side, so
> readers have clear notion where it ends and main material continues.

This is complex layout, something that DTP programs (InDesign, Quark,
Scribus) do very well as they work on the concept of multiple threads of
connected text boxes. [offtopic: in LaTeX there is an attempt to emulate
that with the flowfram package, with obvious limitations. And the Sile
typesetting system is very interesting and promising, which tries to
combine the WYSIWYM style of TeX and the linked text boxes of DTP
programs: https://sile-typesetter.org/]. But --- returning to the
topic---, even so, there is always an underlying notion of hierarchy,
levels and dependency, which is what I was referring to: there is a
skeleton. I think that Org's system of trees and nodes, agnostic of any
typographic format, is enough to maintain that hierarchy. In fact, I
have some works with a very complex output starting simply from Org
(right now I'm with a trilingual edition, using flowfram: for example,
certain Org nodes are exported as flowfram boxes). Obviously, that can
also be done from XML (an example of a combination of xml and LuaTeX:
https://www.speedata.de/en/). But I think, perhaps in a somewhat
quixotic way, that Org has tremendous potential and can play very well
in that league. XML is more accurate; but Org is a great compendium of

  reply	other threads:[~2021-12-24 20:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-23 16:11 Robert Nikander
2021-12-23 16:54 ` Max Nikulin
2021-12-23 20:27 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2021-12-24 16:51   ` Max Nikulin
2021-12-24 20:17     ` Juan Manuel Macías [this message]
2021-12-25 13:15       ` Max Nikulin
2021-12-26  5:23         ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-12-26  9:17         ` Juan Manuel Macías
2021-12-23 23:12 ` Tim Cross
2021-12-23 21:21 Robert Nikander
2021-12-23 21:47 ` John Kitchin
2021-12-23 22:10 ` Juan Manuel Macías

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87fsqhhi5f.fsf@posteo.net \
    --to=maciaschain@posteo.net \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --subject='Re: text after sub headings?' \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:


This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).