From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6MykKOuJa2TRHAAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 17:27:39 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id qL1OKOuJa2SeagAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 17:27:39 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 402A22B40B for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 17:27:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q17Qs-0005Ya-Gq; Mon, 22 May 2023 11:26:46 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q17Qn-0005Y8-3d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2023 11:26:41 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q17Ql-00006N-1l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 22 May 2023 11:26:40 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8F6F240028 for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 17:26:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1684769196; bh=Pj8dCSRGXzTSiqccCDnSD2qaA3NDMfdKwVZwZGBbJUI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:From; b=Q1mUap5+kMvubdkssIICtA0XmQ1ojl80Ukd6Vf9RTh3gKcoFHbBEfhyvgBZfrKFk9 L7280pX+Hu+qBCROtO70yqIRqK1jW2e/HWMfvN3GLkRGF7zBG1JgMDuuSX2/WHNk17 Tith0C9QVDH7cfD6k9g/4a4vQUhY1TY12ArqDSLJN+VvJ9jQIz7qi+UBt5mq0BUEp+ XrITslAohFv/u0eobLuzHVrGVljP78lBIInZmq03fY61UMcZ/yYj3C/KFXIolzqKYm bR61R7ALdK4dUk5gH01ScEpf9YXCAw6zW5U/Ql0AZkeBuRcTfLiV28OhLBY3iQcvKz 8LYpSwrgwUtJA== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4QQ1Wc24Bxz9rxB; Mon, 22 May 2023 17:26:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Andrea Lazzarini Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [FR] Enhancing footnote managment (via indirect buffer)? In-Reply-To: <9C915190-B2C6-4F32-8A2F-A7E7DAAD1AFA@gmail.com> References: <914084EE-E301-483F-AE2A-960B3CB75497@gmail.com> <87o7mcoaht.fsf@localhost> <9C915190-B2C6-4F32-8A2F-A7E7DAAD1AFA@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 15:30:26 +0000 Message-ID: <87fs7oo031.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1684769259; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=r92F9f/a2l7iM3iN0n98+qhdW/wTYzxUc+0VmzY1LKu/ttMx1Cs7vMFqcYgwCJ4HE4ZtPm UNszyfZN29kDOTKDYbaXRAdtducLyucOGK4ZY3M8/E7HTphYcuRyFkqSqYPoMYTm35uDeN gB6373DjJRz3aqhcl32Fg3bliaaI5xiuxSTDUO3NjZ9PgPiCjh4tS2IrSsPJO0SD7xKvR9 6gmhRhhP1H+2/FbZ5VPbpNVjcUDrunp/xh0vosxEaluW370ZzL4WCBMjlJzprwUdEjnn6c DYGQVYHmBMQ3wx7SMzcVLCTcT8enYkE7qfpiocb6E47LXXHWWzGV6agtgL3zWg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Q1mUap5+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1684769259; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=1OJDjjbOW8cFgvc5ybWyeS6qnS8ETReHOUWVQRdau3Q=; b=kdyvA20PQmhdO0dhVi9dThAlclhWVmGNuKe3wWVT0ySjrmgIhlnILGvTyE4adOHz1ETptF D7VN/DnMB8XVsrnOtwH2FA/ImwxFGHDD2QddBt0CzhersqpREoNpz61u4twir6QOdHS6Vu JbUpjdHGtRKQprUL8tG99C4JWbqF5Esh4BMZeHhRsgN/kfTzQnIOnUtF7dcrDzfEt66OpZ RsTtWLkdQ4fRgJ3UA3Z5eNuGuQLLpl/eHtsvkwmoNR1TnTRk3LQxIuZv8FuqSjdyI1h6G9 jtYp0rmeFaQgMU2qT1+SWLJwCIAWYAYm80I7rGkgwLZdAzJfUAgTGoCt6/rGUw== X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.17 X-Spam-Score: -5.17 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 402A22B40B X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Q1mUap5+; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-TUID: n3nhBz6+Ltq+ Andrea Lazzarini writes: > Eldoc (or tooltips) could be great for previewing: I'm going to give them a try > and to see how they might be integrated in an academic writing workflow. > I wander if they would maintain buffer-specific highlighting though... AFAIK, Eldoc expects a function that will return the string to be displayed. You can use `font-lock-ensure' to fontify the footnote definition you need to display. Then, the copied string will hold the fontification as it would be in Org mode buffer. >> "Eeasier Footnote Deletion": How is it different from `org-footnote-delete'? >> > > That was nothing more than a simple wrapper for org-footnote-delete, which > is not an interactive function: btw, I am curious to know if there is a reason for > that. Why should users re-implement org-footnote-delete with wrappers if > they want to use it interactively? I see nothing in git history and mailing list. I think that it makes sense to convert org-footnote-delete into interactive function. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at