From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ignotus@freemail.hu Subject: Re: feature request: (more) in agenda? Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:38:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87ejigsmfs.fsf@freemail.hu> References: <87myx5pt33.fsf@freemail.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1II4f5-0003dT-2k for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:38:27 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1II4f1-0003dA-4M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:38:26 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1II4f0-0003d7-UW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:38:22 -0400 Received: from viefep18-int.chello.at ([213.46.255.22] helo=viefep34-int.chello.at) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1II4ey-0004fl-9I for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:38:21 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.175] (really [80.98.106.103]) by viefep34-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070806153812.PGNW8078.viefep34-int.chello.at@[192.168.0.175]> for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2007 17:38:12 +0200 Received: from ignotus by localhost with local (masqmail 0.2.21) id 1II4et-7jZ-00 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2007 17:38:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Scott Jaderholm's message of "Mon, 6 Aug 2007 08:50:53 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>> Regarding 'Re: [Orgmode] feature request: (more) in agenda?'; Scott Jaderholm adds: > On 8/5/07, ignotus@freemail.hu wrote: >> When I browse my todos in agenda view (see below) most of the time >> I forget about whether I have comments or not, so I don't even >> check: > I've been using : to designate headings that have notes (as opposed > to ones that have SCHEDULED etc.). > * Some heading: > Works alright, but I think (more) would be better. I think it should > be displayed in the org buffer as well as in the agenda. As long as > it's configurable no one should have a problem. I'd also like it to > be configurable whether or not it includes SCHEDULED and the like as > "more." Well, I would be very happy with ":" too, as long as it is automatically added to the agenda views. :) -- Udv, Ricsi