From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: Filtering for effort in org-agenda Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:22:39 -0400 Message-ID: <87eiwd3jz4.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> References: <87tz5aq48u.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87ab72d9xs.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <87iqlp3mxx.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> <6A61D6DF-501B-422A-BBBE-D57382792201@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LodvT-00009I-Ch for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:22:47 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LodvP-0008RV-4d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:22:46 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38095 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LodvO-0008R1-W4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:22:43 -0400 Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:51576) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LodvO-0002s6-QB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:22:42 -0400 In-Reply-To: <6A61D6DF-501B-422A-BBBE-D57382792201@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue\, 31 Mar 2009 15\:20\:39 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Org Mode List Carsten Dominik writes: > On Mar 31, 2009, at 2:18 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > >> Carsten Dominik writes: >> >>> On Mar 30, 2009, at 10:37 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: >>>> >> List of all TODO entries (excluding dated items) >> / Limit to NEXT tagged tasks >> / / Limit to effort <= 0 >> / / / >> C-c a t / N / + 1 > > You are now using "1" and have your first effort etimate set to zero > minutes. > I guess we could make "0" a special selection, not for the 10th effort > step, but for no effort defined. Would that make sense? Sounds good to me. I still hit '0' instead of '1' by mistake sometimes ... and end up with everything < 8 hours :) I did that just this morning. -Bernt