From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: full production use of org-mode: time to say thanks again!
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2010 19:00:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87eibzfgia.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com>
References: <87r5fzk5j5.wl%ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<20EA118D-E909-47F4-AEF8-8B1B929F5601@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48809 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P4d1S-0008MW-TU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 13:15:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1P4cmn-0002IV-Pv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 13:00:42 -0400
Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:57566)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1P4cmn-0002ID-Kj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 13:00:41 -0400
Received: by wyb35 with SMTP id 35so2447wyb.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 09 Oct 2010 10:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20EA118D-E909-47F4-AEF8-8B1B929F5601@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

>>>>> Carsten Dominik writes:

> On Oct 9, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:

>> Footnotes: [1] If I have one niggle to report it is that indenting
>> text after an in-line todo doesn't seem to work properly: it
>> indents any subsequent paragraphs much too far, lining up with the
>> headline text for the in-line todo. This seems conceptually wrong
>> to me. Not a big deal, mind you.

> This is clearly a bug. Nicolas, could you be persuaded to have a
> look at that? You have worked on the indentation code reently in
> connection with the plain lists.

I can have a look at it, but I would need an example to work on as I
never use "inline todo". I don't want to sound too lazy, but could
Eric provide a minimal example to get me started ?

Regards,

-- Nicolas