From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>,
Rainer Stengele <rainer.stengele@diplan.de>
Subject: Re: clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 18:55:54 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eibcr2bp.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17D87A22-AF39-43F2-AA5F-58115D19EB12@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2010 17:52:30 +0200")
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> On Oct 26, 2010, at 3:53 PM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>
>> Am 26.10.2010 13:30, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
>>> Hi Rainer, hi Bernt,
>>>
>>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>>>
>>>> Am 21.07.2010 16:24, schrieb Carsten Dominik:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Jul 13, 2010, at 11:21 AM, Rainer Stengele wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> lately I use the marvelous clocktables a lot...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For toplevel clocktables which just sum up "all" I use
>>>>>> ":maxlevel 0"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The manual reads
>>>>>>
>>>>>> :maxlevel Maximum level depth to which times are listed in
>>>>>> the table.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which I misunderstood.
>>>>>> I understood: an unlisted item does not mean that its time is
>>>>>> not added!
>>>>>> But it looks like ":maxlevel 0" does not add everything up.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot reproduce this, :maxlevel 0 works for me.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ok, maybe the manual is a bit misleading here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How can I get a clocktable without any details which simply adds
>>>>>> up everything in the scope?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BTW, the ":stepskip0" parameter does not seem to be included in
>>>>>> the manual.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is in the manual.
>>>>>
>>>>> - Carsten
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rainer
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Carsten,
>>>>
>>>> maybe I misunderstood.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. Without maxlevbel I get I get
>>>>
>>>> #+BEGIN: clocktable :scope ("file1.org" "file2") :timestamp t
>>>> :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend "<2010-07-31 Sa 23:55>"
>>>> Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:07]
>>>>
>>>> | File | L | Timestamp | Headline |
>>>> Time | | |
>>>> |-------------------+---+---------------------+----------------
>>>> +----------+--------+--------|
>>>> | | | Timestamp | *Total time* |
>>>> *327:51* | | |
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> with :maxlevel 0 I get
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> #+BEGIN: clocktable :maxlevel 0 :scope ("file1.org" "file2")
>>>> :timestamp t :tstart "<2010-05-01 Sa 00:00>" :tend "<2010-07-31
>>>> Sa 23:55>"
>>>> Clock summary at [2010-07-22 Do 09:11]
>>>>
>>>> | File | L | Timestamp | Headline | Time |
>>>> |------+---+-----------+--------------+----------|
>>>> | | | Timestamp | *Total time* | *232:17* |
>>>> |------+---+-----------+--------------+----------|
>>>> #+END:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I would like to get the same results!
>>>> Is ":maxlevel 0" intended to not include the sublevel clocks?
>>>
>>> I think I have finally fixed this bug. Please verify.
>>>
>>> Bernt, I made a change to clock tables which I think I understand.
>>> But can you please watch out for inconsistencies with the newest
>>> version? Maybe run some tests with old and new version, to make
>>> sure clock tables deliver the same results?
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> - Carsten
>>
>> Hi Carsten,
>>
>> I checked and found:
>>
>> - clocktable sums are resulting in identical values, independant of
>> the ":maxlevel" level
>> - without ":maxlevel" parameter some tables now give slightly
>> different results than in the past, some give identical results
>> * I hope the new results are correct, but I did not have time to
>> check in detail
>>
>> Looks good, I will test further.
>
> no, this did not look good.
>
> I think I have found a bug, please pull again...
>
> - Carsten
Hi Carsten,
I haven't had time to pull the new clock table code yet. I'll try to
get to it by the end of the week. I don't currently use clock tables
all that much other than R in the agenda.
Thanks for testing this early Rainer.
Regards,
Bernt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-26 22:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-13 9:21 clocktable: maximum level 0 does not only avoid listing items but also does not calculate items Rainer Stengele
2010-07-21 14:24 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-07-22 7:16 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-07-22 7:47 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-07 8:41 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-10-26 11:30 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-26 13:53 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-10-26 14:27 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-26 15:52 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-26 22:55 ` Bernt Hansen [this message]
2010-10-27 7:01 ` Rainer Stengele
2010-10-30 16:18 ` Bernt Hansen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eibcr2bp.fsf@gollum.intra.norang.ca \
--to=bernt@norang.ca \
--cc=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=rainer.stengele@diplan.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).