emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
To: Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Matthew Oesting <oestingm@me.com>
Subject: Re: Possible Calc support for Org-Babel?
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 07:24:16 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eib1dxll.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 878w1ani4w.fsf@ucl.ac.uk

Alright,

I've just pushed up support for variables.  The following should all
work as expected (or at least as I would expect them to).  Note that
most all of these blocks would have an effect on the calc stack.  I
think the next step would be to allow different sessions to specify
different stacks.

** playing with calc support
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
  (require 'ob-calc)
#+end_src

#+begin_src calc :var some=8
  some
  some
  '*
  1
  '+
#+end_src

#+results:
: 65

#+begin_src calc
  2*(8+8)
#+end_src

#+results:
: 32

#+begin_src calc
  2*e
#+end_src

#+results:
: 5.43656365692

#+begin_src calc :var something=9
  2*something
#+end_src

#+results:
: 18

There are very likely some bugs, and as always I'm eager for a calc
power user to show me the light of how this support could be make more
"calc idiomatic".

Cheers -- Eric

Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> writes:

> Forgot to CC the list et al.
>
> "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Eric S Fraga <ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> I now wonder if it would be worthwhile discussing the choices you have
>>> made regarding stack versus algebraic evaluation.  I would rather have
>>> the quote mean an algebraic expression, just from the simple reason that
>>> these will be longer than stack operations and so the overhead of a
>>> quote is smaller as a percentage of keystrokes...
>>>
>>
>> Hmm, one point against prefixing the algebraic expressions is that they
>> would be more likely to be used by themselves in an inline code block.
>
> Yes, I guess so.  My initial thoughts were that we have plenty of
> algebraic languages available already through babel (octave, R, python,
> ...) so why not support a stack based one more directly.   However, the
> real benefit of calc is that it is *emacs* and not external!  Algebraic
> is more natural to most people so making it easy for them to express
> themselves makes sense.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-04 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-03 22:42 Possible Calc support for Org-Babel? Eric S Fraga
2010-11-04 13:24 ` Eric Schulte [this message]
2010-11-04 14:13   ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-04 14:42   ` Sébastien Vauban
2010-11-04 15:33     ` Eric Schulte
2010-11-04 16:02       ` Sébastien Vauban
2010-11-04 16:23         ` Eric Schulte
2011-01-27  0:39   ` Christopher Allan Webber
2011-02-23  4:35     ` Eric Schulte
2011-02-24 10:13       ` Eric S Fraga
2011-02-27 21:32         ` Eric Schulte
2011-02-28 18:16           ` Eric S Fraga
2011-03-01 17:34             ` Eric Schulte
2011-03-01 20:10               ` Eric S Fraga
2011-03-07  9:16               ` Eric S Fraga
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-03-01 20:48 orgmode
2010-10-22 17:17 Matthew Oesting
2010-10-26 18:37 ` Eric Schulte
2010-10-29  6:42   ` Eric Schulte
2010-10-29  7:13     ` Carsten Dominik
2010-10-29 11:14     ` Eric S Fraga
2010-10-29 14:43       ` Eric Schulte
2010-10-29 16:22         ` Eric Schulte
2010-10-29 19:53         ` Eric S Fraga
2010-10-29 20:26           ` Eric Schulte
     [not found]             ` <87hbg4pooh.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
     [not found]               ` <871v7879x5.fsf@gmail.com>
2010-10-30 20:54                 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-11-03 20:10                   ` Eric Schulte
2010-10-29 11:27     ` Sébastien Vauban

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87eib1dxll.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=schulte.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=oestingm@me.com \
    --cc=ucecesf@ucl.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).