From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Prefix arguments, checklists, and lists Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:58:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehh99xfu.fsf@gmail.com> References: <878v7q2o9b.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59451) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tyjnk-00074m-6S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:58:47 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tyjnd-0008CI-Oo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:58:40 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:64291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tyjnd-0008C0-9C for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 08:58:33 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id dr13so243092wgb.2 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:58:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Robert Horn's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:31:46 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Robert Horn Cc: Org-mode Hello, Robert Horn writes: > I've got no problem waiting, but it would be a good idea to figure out a > consistent non-contradictory key-binding in advance, so you can switch > to that when you make the other changes. I made the change to the internals. Actually, there is no contradictory key-bindings. As a rule of thumb, C-c C-c on a list will operate on every top level items and C-c C-c on a item will operate on the item. You are considered to be on a list when calling C-c C-c from affiliated keywords or from the very beginning of the first line in the first item. Note that element-wise navigation (like M-{ and M-}) behaves the same. As a convenient exception, since calling C-c C-c without argument on a whole list does nothing, it will operate on the first item instead. What do you find inconsistent? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou