From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Highlighting LaTeX fragments
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 22:22:50 +0100
Message-ID: <87ehggq7h1.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87vca1towm.fsf@pank.eu> <8738x5s6r1.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87liaxtjf3.fsf@pank.eu> <87a9rdgjtw.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87mwv41d8f.fsf@pank.iue.private>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45357)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1U6pDw-0005Kb-VW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:23:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1U6pDv-0006fl-TM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:23:08 -0500
Received: from we-in-x022c.1e100.net ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]:57723
	helo=mail-we0-x22c.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1U6pDv-0006fd-MC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:23:07 -0500
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id x10so3838954wey.17
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 13:23:06 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87mwv41d8f.fsf@pank.iue.private> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of
	"Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:37:36 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

>> Would you mind testing the following patch? I don't like it much because
>> it's an all or nothing fontification. I think latex snippets, entities
>> and sub/superscript should be separated.
>
> I have no experienced any problems.  I agree that it would be better
> not to be able not to fontitfy rouge entities and super/subscripts.
>
>> Anyway, does it replace the missing functionality?
>
> Yes, it seems so replicate the old behavior so far.

I have applied a small variant of the patch. You can configure
`org-highlight-latex-and-related' variable to fontify said syntax
separately.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou