From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox-latex: provide width and height options for images Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:04:48 +0100 Message-ID: <87ehg2fzhr.fsf@pank.iue.private> References: <87obf63mq6.fsf@gmail.com> <1361906554-26709-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UATa8-0000X0-1q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:05:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UATa5-0003XH-TX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:05:07 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UATa5-0003WD-MV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:05:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UATaN-0003Q1-NE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:05:23 +0100 Received: from dynamic-adsl-94-34-152-98.clienti.tiscali.it ([94.34.152.98]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:05:23 +0100 Received: from rasmus by dynamic-adsl-94-34-152-98.clienti.tiscali.it with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:05:23 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1361906554-26709-1-git-send-email-aaronecay@gmail.com> (Aaron Ecay's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:22:34 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Aaron Ecay writes: > WDYT? > [...] > These are implemented with \resizebox, and thus are uniform across > different types of image inclusion (\includegraphics, \input of tikz > images). This differs from the older way of using width and height > optional args to \includegraphics. I don't like it. Why would we use resizebox rather than the the arguments in includegraphics for pictures? From a TeXnish perspective it seems wrong and inelegant to me (totally subjective). For tikz figures resizing should be done via the scale argument to preserve the right font sizes. If people want to resize a tikz figure they should do so in their tikz code. That being said, better tikz handling in Org is a wonderful idea. –Rasmus -- Need more coffee. . .