From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: M-RET slow Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:46:51 +0200 Message-ID: <87ehdx73j8.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fvyd7q3m.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ip3974uj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVjvL-0007Tu-SG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:46:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVjvK-0007dn-Mo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:46:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Fri, 26 Apr 2013 16:33:14 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Bastien , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Carsten Dominik writes: > is org-in-item-p slow? It is slow, and `org-insert-heading' was calling it (directly or indirectly) four times. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou