From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: evaluation context in call statements
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:11:08 -0600
Message-ID: <87ehboiyqb.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <444ea6cff489e2adc97092bdac881aef@mail.rickster.com>
	<878v1y574d.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <874ncm55ma.fsf@Rainer.invalid>
	<CALn3zohXL0x21gYhKj7QS0prJXDC_OcC4qgcejAqtk7b8-KytQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87r4fq3ptf.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ip11h2zq.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CALn3zoiou-sf12V7Vs235UKsTjLWwtL2AQJYnAVm-KEdtN_NMA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ehboewrr.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CALn3zoivLtiByMmLx_=bA_9vmo75jWY_sJQdamnD8J-h_hGZmw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45357)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UrtGR-0004jm-8b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:12:17 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UrtGP-0005EZ-Cy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:12:15 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-x231.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::231]:64964)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1UrtGP-0005EQ-6c
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 13:12:13 -0400
Received: by mail-pa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ld11so14337099pab.22
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALn3zoivLtiByMmLx_=bA_9vmo75jWY_sJQdamnD8J-h_hGZmw@mail.gmail.com>
	(Michael Brand's message of "Wed, 26 Jun 2013 18:53:43 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

> I am sorry, I wanted to say that I want to do something like
> (note: not current behavior)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> #+NAME: i_am_curious_how_this_works
> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp
>   (format "%s" org-babel-current-src-block-location)
> #+END_SRC
>
> #+CALL: i_am_curious_how_this_works()
>
> #+RESULTS: i_am_curious_how_this_works()
> : #<marker at 124 in tmp.org>
> #+CALL: i_am_curious_how_this_works()
>
> #+RESULTS: i_am_curious_how_this_works()
> : #<marker at 236 in tmp.org>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> and would like the yet to be defined solution in discussion here to
> make also this possible,

If we do add #+names to call lines, and have them adopt the existing
code block result behavior, then the above will work without
modification.

[...]
>> Currently if you want have separate results for call lines with the same
>> variables you will need to use a dummy variable.
>
> Ok, this answers one of my questions in the other thread and confirms
> my expectation. Does it mean that my patch with the ERT as of
> 2013-06-19 from the other thread is ok for now and can be applied just
> to reflect what is currently supported? Or should I change something
> else in the patch?
>

Yes, I've just applied this patch.  Sorry for the delay.

Thanks,

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte