From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [RFC] [patch] open/delete attachment with inherited directory Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:57:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87eh5a8dnt.fsf@gmail.com> References: <874n69fkxc.fsf@gmail.com> <87sitr8jpd.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppoueob2.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40583) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtHd0-0007J0-H6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:57:43 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtHcs-0002pF-3p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:57:34 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]:34509) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VtHcr-0002p5-TR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 08:57:26 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id en1so5309724wid.11 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 05:57:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from selenimh ([91.224.148.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id p9sm1229631wia.10.2013.12.18.05.57.20 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Dec 2013 05:57:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87ppoueob2.fsf@gmail.com> (Aaron Ecay's message of "Wed, 18 Dec 2013 00:11:13 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Aaron Ecay writes: > Hmm, good catch. Perhaps then we should read the property if it exists, > but fall back to querying the filesystem in case it does not. WDYT? I didn't test it, but there might be a problem if a file name contains white spaces. If there isn't, it doesn't hurt to provide this alternative way to get attached files (and `org-attach-file-list-property' need to mention it). Otherwise, I think there are too many limitations in this patch to be worth applying. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou