From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: \newpage in HTML export Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 13:41:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87eh4nkjfu.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> References: <8738moubd4.fsf_-_@ericabrahamsen.net> <8738mo68fi.fsf@gmail.com> <3389069.jUrlGMUlNA@descartes> <87a9gu6t92.fsf@gmail.com> <87k3fym54f.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87li0dvr4d.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87wqixhu66.fsf@gmail.com> <871u0pcbw0.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwjckgnf.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87iou0kes4.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87d2k8t4hh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59390) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzQYZ-0006Nc-5j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 07:42:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzQYQ-0000XX-TF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 07:42:23 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54655) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VzQYQ-0000XA-Mb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 07:42:14 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VzQYN-0008Ue-Lb for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 13:42:11 +0100 Received: from vpn-2083.gwdg.de ([134.76.2.83]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 13:42:11 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by vpn-2083.gwdg.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 13:42:11 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bastien writes: > Hi Andreas, > > Andreas Leha writes: > >> It is a very small thing and I am very much happy with using a filter based >> approach here. > > One thing really worth improving is the tutorials around filters on > Worg. Or maybe: let's create a place similar to org-hacks.org called > org-filters.org listing useful filters. I agree. an org-filters collection would be awesome! > > Any taker? Not me, I am afraid, since I am completely out of time right now(so that I should actually not read or write anything on this list...). I am very sorry -- would have been a nice way to contribute. Regards, Andreas