From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Richard Subject: Re: [RFC] Sloppy `org-element-context'? Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2014 11:15:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87eh0t65pe.fsf@geodiff-mac3.ulb.ac.be> References: <874n2jsls9.fsf@gmail.com> <871twteltj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbRM9-0003hg-CN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 05:14:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WbRM1-0000ZK-Ln for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Apr 2014 05:14:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871twteltj.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Sat, 19 Apr 2014 10:47:38 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Org Mode List , Nicolas Goaziou Bastien writes: > I don't think `org-element-context' should be sloppy *at all*. > > Hope this all makes sense -- let me know what you think. It makes sense to me, and I agree with you : org element should not parse the syntax differently just because e.g. we put a link in a comment and want to open it. For comparison, AucTeX has a variable LaTeX-syntactic-comments which controls that kind of thing : "If non-nil comments will be handled according to LaTeX syntax." -- Nico.