From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: emails written in Org Mode Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 09:52:00 +0800 Message-ID: <87egxnpewv.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87r41uwdiy.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu> <87pph8n40m.fsf@quasar.esben-stien.name> <87mwcckqru.fsf@quasar.esben-stien.name> <87mwcb36aj.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu> <874myjqwqn.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r41nh20m.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55510) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6rul-0006z1-Ht for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:52:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6rug-00045X-5G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:52:19 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:37052) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1X6ruf-00042L-TQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jul 2014 21:52:14 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1X6rue-0006hn-Dr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 03:52:12 +0200 Received: from 111.199.151.233 ([111.199.151.233]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 03:52:12 +0200 Received: from eric by 111.199.151.233 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2014 03:52:12 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thorsten Jolitz writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> John Kitchin writes: >> >>> I usually do this kind of tracking with a link to the email instead. It >>> is not automated communication between email and org, and it is not that >>> complicated, but it does what I need, when I need it. >> >> I will stop with shameless plugs at some point here, but this is exactly >> what Gnorb does ... > > Why? Nothing more frustrating than implementing a *brandnew* idea only > to find out later on that idea & implementation already existed. I would > not call this 'shameless plugs' but rather necessary and useful library > advertising, but maybe I'm biased since I tend to do the same thing ;) It's true it's hard to keep quiet when people are mulling over the *exact* thing your library does... :) > PS > > Hadn't have the time to try Gnorb, but the combination of gnus&org is > definitely interesting for me.