From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
Subject: Re: Why not push?
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:56:01 +0100
Message-ID: <87egprwiim.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl>
References: <87h9unwk0r.fsf@wmi.amu.edu.pl> <87d25bo3wj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87oaov3173.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34637)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1YMws2-00033N-Tv
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:56:19 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1YMwry-0001pH-4S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:56:14 -0500
Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([2001:808:114:2::50]:50778)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl>) id 1YMwrx-0001p2-U6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 05:56:10 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5167552072
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:56:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id BLJrPercccO0 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>;
	Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:56:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (117-116.echostar.pl [213.156.117.116])
	by msg.wmi.amu.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0B00952063
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 11:56:08 +0100 (CET)
In-reply-to: <87oaov3173.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


On 2015-02-15, at 11:42, Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net> wrote:

> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Marcin Borkowski <mbork@wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:
>>
>>> I don't want to be nitpicking, but I'm just curious.  I'm looking at the
>>> function `org-split-string'.  It uses (two times) the following
>>> construction:
>>>
>>> (setq list (cons (something) list))
>>>
>>> Is there any particular reason for not using `push' there?
>>
>> No. Good luck with refactoring "org.el". ;)
>
> Shhh... if you don't say anything, he might go and do it!

;-)

Actually, not.  (Though it might make a nice student project.  And it
would be a good idea to do it.)  But I haven't signed the FSF papers.

OTOH, I have a personal project where I devote some amount of time every
day to read someone else's code.  I started with parts of simple.el, and
now the time has come for ox-latex (and its dependencies).

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University