From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [ox, patch] Keywords & what should go in ox? Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:47:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87egomtfpy.fsf@gmx.us> References: <871tkrsmxh.fsf@gmx.us> <87a8ze3bsa.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pp87hbxk.fsf@gmx.us> <87h9tj39uk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33825) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYH8D-0002dn-UH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:47:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYH88-00088Z-Sg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:47:45 -0400 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:51175) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YYH88-00088H-KU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:47:40 -0400 Received: from x200s ([46.166.186.247]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M0QLp-1ZNcKU2mfl-00uay7 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 17:47:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87h9tj39uk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:46:43 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Rasmus writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >>> We don't need a convoluted markup for that, let's keep it simple. >> >> But then you'd have to repeat data. E.g. >> >> #+KEYWORDS: my keywords for meta-data that should also be printed. >> my keywords for meta-data that should also be printed. >> >> This seems error prone and undesirable IMO. > > Except that this is not a real repetition. As you mentioned, in the > latter case, you want to throw in links and probably other markup, which > make no sense in plain meta-data. Keywords are akin to small headings to identify the contents of a document. I see no reason to restrict this to the reader of the electronic version of a document. > IMO, this is over-engineering. I disagree, but extrapolating this will go nowhere. =E2=80=94Rasmus --=20 Got mashed potatoes. Ain't got no T-Bone. No T-Bone