From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: ox-latex: default packages cleaning Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:30:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87egjuxarx.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87r3ok589c.fsf@gmx.us> <20150707193522.GB30985@chitra.no-ip.org> <87y4iq24kl.fsf@gmx.us> <20150708154139.GG32342@chitra.no-ip.org> <878uaq33bj.fsf@gmx.us> <20150716082958.GP18343@chitra.no-ip.org> <87y4igxza3.fsf@gmx.us> <86si8am2lq.fsf@example.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJdoI-0006PB-0L for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:30:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJdoE-0001WX-LU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:30:57 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJdoE-0001V5-BS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 04:30:54 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJdo8-0007Xc-Sg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:30:48 +0200 Received: from ip5b4025d5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([91.64.37.213]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:30:48 +0200 Received: from rasmus by ip5b4025d5.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:30:48 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Sebastien Vauban writes: > FWIW, it seems that people who played with different LaTeX engines used > the "LATEX_CMD" property, as adviced on Worg [1]. Doesn't matter if we > change that, but just a reminder of some already common usage. I didn't know that worg page. Just to understand, you are advising to use "LATEX_CMD" as the keyword name? FWIW, that's fine with me, though presently it's not really accurate as only {pdf,xe,lua}latex is allowed (I'm hesitant to allow arbitrary scripts). Rasmus -- Not everything that goes around comes back around, you know