From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: [RFC] Draft mode Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:54:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87egh55mhz.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87io6w9p7y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87io6vd7vl.fsf@gmx.us> <87r3l6jv55.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87oag95thw.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46539) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkETV-0000q0-Fq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:56:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkETB-0004dm-4F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:55:25 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:33090) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkETA-0004d4-RM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:55:04 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkET8-0006RO-Ml for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:55:02 +0200 Received: from 62.80.108.9 ([62.80.108.9]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:55:02 +0200 Received: from rasmus by 62.80.108.9 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 18:55:02 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thomas S. Dye writes: >>>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who >>>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to >>>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think >>>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor. >>> >>> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome. >> >> I agree. We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different >> from latex-proper classes. This seems to cause a lot of confusion. >> Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future. >> >> It’s a "relaxed" mode. I’m not sure what a good term for this is. > > Trial mode? The latex flag would be "-interaction=nonstopmode". Probably a similar flag exits in GCC. The Knitr option is simply called error ∈ {TRUE, FALSE}. I like nonstopmode, but I don’t care particularly for the "interaction" classification. Rasmus -- Governments should be afraid of their people