From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Release 9.1.12
Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2018 12:39:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87efj1c4ri.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87lgd9dofg.fsf@gnu.org> <87604dvwu5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53005)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>)
	id 1fC0mu-0007X4-JS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 06:39:37 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bzg@gnu.org>) id 1fC0mq-0003SP-Jg
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2018 06:39:36 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87604dvwu5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Fri, 27 Apr 2018 11:10:26 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi Nicolas,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

>> Org 9.1.12, a bugfix release, is out.
>
> However, you forgot to update "Version:" keyword in org.el prior to
> release, AFAICT.

D'oh! Thanks for spotting and reporting this, fixed now.

Speaking of which... IIRC one of the reasons for not having

  (defconst org-version "9.1.12")

in org.el was to having merge conflicts.

Does having "Version: 9.1.12" in org.el means we can switch back
to having (defconst org-version "9.1.12") there as well?

Could it fix the very annoying "I-don't-know-what-Org-version-is
running-within-my-Emacs" issue?

I'm aware that M-x org-version RET is more informative today,
but I also see just too many people struggling with the current
way of setting the version.

Let me know what you think,

-- 
 Bastien