From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC] C-c C-c in agenda
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 21:20:42 -0600
Message-ID: <87eevjgd85.fsf@alphapapa.net>
References: <84mua8c4zh.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42837)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1iwduQ-0003xO-CP
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:20:56 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1iwduO-0003ah-H8
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:20:54 -0500
Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:35722)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1iwduM-0003TQ-HR
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:20:50 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1iwduH-000Oy1-TI
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 04:20:45 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com> writes:

> For some days now C-c C-c disables column view in Org files.  This helps
> me a bit and never got in my way.  And I thought it would be quite
> natural and consistent to use this binding for the agenda too.
>
> What do you think about all that?

Hi Marco,

I've always had the impression that the "C-c C-c" binding was intended
to do the most obviously useful or natural action in the current
context.  For example, in a capture or log buffer, it completes the
capture.  With point on a #+ line, it resets buffer properties
accordingly.

I don't use column view very often, so I may be biased, but anyway: in
the general context of an Agenda buffer, I don't feel like enabling or
disabling column view is the most obviously useful or natural thing to
do, so "C-c C-c" doesn't seem like an appropriate binding to me.